Navigating U.S.-Canada Cross-Border Taxes: A CPA’s Guide for Growing Businesses

In this article:

Companies expanding across the U.S.-Canada border often outpace their tax, payroll, and accounting systems in scaling. A single remote employee, warehouse setup, or cross-border project can generate filing obligations that leadership remains unaware of until IRS or CRA inquiries arise. At that point, compliance shifts to a reactive and costly process.

The U.S. implements its own sourcing rules and a worldwide income system for many taxpayers. In contrast, Canada depends on CRA interpretations, provincial rules, and treaty principles. While the U.S.-Canada Tax Treaty aligns these systems, it does not make them simpler. Companies are still required to document their activities clearly, consistently, and defensibly.

A CPA-led approach starts with structure:

Where is value created, who performs the work, and how does money move between entities?

Once this is established, the business can correctly apply treaty provisions, assess permanent establishment risks, establish payroll in the right jurisdictions, and prevent double taxation. Without this foundation, cross-border compliance becomes a guessing game.

Below are the areas where small and mid-sized businesses most often encounter exposure.

Permanent Establishment (PE): The Most Common Blind Spot

Many businesses operate internationally without understanding that their activities can establish a permanent establishment, which allows the other country to tax their profits. PE influences corporate filings, tax obligations, and documentation requirements. As operations expand, PE risk quickly increases unless it is actively managed.

Practical PE triggers businesses to underestimate

A CPA evaluates PE based on actual activity, not titles or assumptions. Common triggers include:

Employees or contractors regularly enter into contracts. Inventory stored in a foreign country’s warehouse or fulfillment center. Technical staff providing on-site services for extended periods. A fixed place of business, including long-term coworking spaces. Cross-border decision-making by management.

Example:

A U.S. e-commerce company stored inventory in a Canadian warehouse to speed delivery. CRA considered the warehouse to be PE because the inventory belonged to the U.S. entity. Additional Canadian filings were required.

How a CPA reduces PE exposure

A CPA-led review includes:

Aligning contract language with treaty definitions
Documenting where negotiations and decisions occur
Separating support work from contract authority
Establishing defensible intercompany pricing
Tracking time spent on performing services in the other country

Example:

TYM Consulting reorganized a Calgary-Boston software sales team. By adjusting contract authority and redefining service workflows, the company reduced PE exposure and avoided additional filings.

Takeaway:

If your team handles contracts, manages inventory, or does recurring work across the border, PE exposure probably exists. A CPA review can identify treaty implications and help structure operations correctly.

‍

Cross-Border Payroll: Withholding, Reporting, and Compliance Gaps

Payroll obligations start as soon as an employee begins working in a different country. Many companies mistakenly believe payroll depends only on the company's registered location. However, IRS and CRA regulations focus on where the work is actually performed, not where the company is incorporated. Fragmented systems heighten risk: HR handles contracts, finance processes payroll, supervisors approve hours separately, and none of these activities are coordinated according to cross-border rules.

Where payroll risks commonly appear

A CPA evaluates exposure using:

Source of Income Rules
Domestic Payroll Withholding Requirements
Employer Reporting Obligations

Typical cross-border issues include:

U.S. employees working remotely from Canada without a CRA payroll setup
Canadian employees performing billable work for U.S. clients
Contractors who meet the IRS/CRA employee criteria
Employees residing in one U.S. state and working in another

Example:

A Detroit-based engineering firm hired a contractor from Canada. CRA challenged this classification and re-evaluated payroll withholdings. TYM Consulting revised the documentation and worker classification system to ensure compliance with IRS and CRA regulations.

How a CPA structures payroll correctly

A CPA-led payroll review includes:

Mapping where services are performed and for how long
Applying treaty relief for short-term assignments
Establishing payroll accounts in the appropriate jurisdictions
Applying Social Security/Medicare vs CPP/EI rules
Documenting contractor versus employee status

Takeaway:

If employees or contractors perform services across the border, payroll exposure already exists. A CPA review ensures compliance with both IRS and CRA rules.

Dual Filing Requirements and Foreign Tax Credits

When a business earns income or offers services internationally, dual filing requirements often arise. The IRS and CRA have distinct sourcing rules, and while the treaty coordinates taxation, it does not remove the obligation to file multiple reports.

Why dual filings surprise small and mid-sized companies

A CPA evaluates filings based on:

Where services are provided
How revenue is generated
Which entity legally receives the income
How intercompany charges are transferred

Recurring problems include:

U.S. entities earning Canadian-source service income
Canadian companies receiving U.S. management fees without support
Employees causing filing thresholds abroad
Intercompany transactions are lacking documentation

Example:

A SaaS company with employees in Montreal and Austin booked all revenue in its U.S. entity. CRA requested a Canadian tax return. TYM Consulting allocated revenue based on functions performed, used foreign tax credits, and avoided double taxation.

How a CPA avoids double taxation

A CPA-led framework includes:

Identifying IRS and CRA filing triggers
Allocating income and expenses by jurisdiction
Documenting sourcing positions
Claiming foreign tax credits with proper evidence
Aligning intercompany pricing with treaty requirements

Takeaway:

If revenue, payroll, or intercompany activity occurs across both countries, dual filing is probably required. A CPA review helps avoid double taxation and missed credit opportunities.

Intercompany Transactions and Transfer Pricing

Intercompany transactions can become complicated when operations are present in both countries, even for smaller groups. The IRS and CRA require related entities to price their transactions at arm’s length, backed by proper documentation.

Where small companies face transfer-pricing risk

Common issues:

Management fees not linked to specific services
Software or IP charges without support
Payroll allocations without time records
Inventory transfers are priced inconsistently
Shared employees with untracked work allocation

Example:

TYM Consulting reconstructed the management fee allocation model and its documentation to align with CRA standards, following questions from a Winnipeg-Minneapolis distribution company that was supported by only a single spreadsheet.

How a CPA structures intercompany activity correctly

A CPA-led approach includes:

Mapping functions, assets, and risks
Linking charges to measurable activity
Establishing consistent pricing
Documenting methodology
Updating annually as operations evolve

Takeaway:

If your business moves goods, services, or payroll across borders, intercompany pricing needs to be documented.

Indirect Taxes: Sales Tax, GST/HST, and Cross-Border Exposure

Indirect taxes often cause problems. In the U.S., sales tax rules differ by state; in Canada, GST/HST is a federal tax with provincial variations. When businesses operate in both regions, their exposure to these complexities increases quickly.

Common indirect tax problems

A CPA analyzes:

Customer location
Shipping origin and destination
How services are delivered
State/provincial nexus thresholds

Issues include:

Digital services are subject to tax in many U.S. states
Goods shipped from Canada without a U.S. tracking nexus
Services provided to Canadian clients without GST/HST registration
Misapplied marketplace facilitator rules

Example:

A Toronto-San Diego tech company expanded into several U.S. states without monitoring thresholds. After surpassing multiple nexus limits, it faced backdated obligations. TYM Consulting helped by setting up compliant registrations and filing schedules.

How a CPA builds an indirect tax framework

Determining nexus in each state/province
Mapping taxability of products and services
Configuring systems for accurate tax calculations
Creating a filing calendar
Documenting tax-decision logic

Takeaway:

If your business sells in both countries, indirect tax exposure is part of your risk profile.

Systems, Documentation, and Audit Readiness

Cross-border compliance demands systems that monitor activity by jurisdiction. Many accounting platforms fail to generate the documentation required by the IRS and CRA.

Where systems fail

Typical issues:

No jurisdiction-level revenue tracking
Payroll systems are not aligned with worker locations
Intercompany allocations without support
Manual reconciliations that break at scale
No audit trail for allocation changes

Example:

A business operating between Edmonton and Buffalo reported revenue based on customers, not location. During CRA review, this caused sourcing issues. TYM Consulting reconstructed the reporting system and prepared comprehensive documentation.

How a CPA ensures audit readiness

Tracking revenue and expenses across different jurisdictions
Documenting intercompany services and their pricing
Automating the reconciliation process
Creating audit folders that include cross-border schedules
Aligning revenue recognition and payroll practices with IRS/CRA regulations

Takeaway:

If your systems cannot produce defensible cross-border data, audit exposure already exists.

When to Seek CPA-Led Cross-Border Support

Cross-border exposure increases as operations grow, but bookkeepers and compliance-only providers often overlook structural risks. A CPA-led approach ensures alignment across operations, contracts, payroll, intercompany activities, and reporting.

Indicators that cross-border advisory is needed

Employees or contractors working across the border
Revenue sourced in one country but delivered in the other
Intercompany flows without documentation
Sales across multiple U.S. states or Canadian provinces
Payroll is not aligned with the workers' location
Leadership cannot explain the allocation methods

Example:

A Halifax-Chicago company tracked customers, but not where work occurred. A CPA review resolved treaty and sourcing issues and reduced audit risk.

Why CPA-led support prevents long-term issues

CPA advisory provides:

Clear sourcing and allocation rules
Treaty-aligned documentation
Exposure forecasting tools
Compliant intercompany pricing
Consistent payroll and indirect tax processes

A Unified CPA Framework for Cross-Border Stability

Cross-border compliance demands consistent documentation across operations, payroll, intercompany charges, and reporting. Since the IRS and CRA assess these independently, ensuring alignment is essential.

How businesses apply a CPA-led framework