.jpg)
Top-line growth is visible and easy to measure. Cash flow and profitability are harder to manage, but they determine whether a business remains stable as complexity increases.
For growing organizations in Canada and the U.S., financial pressure typically does not come from weak demand. It comes from timing gaps, margin ambiguity, and decisions made without reliable financial visibility. The pattern is common:
- Revenue is rising, but liquidity remains constrained
- Month-end close extends, and reported numbers keep moving
- Hiring and marketing decisions feel urgent, yet financially uncertain
- Cash questions require manual work rather than a consistent reporting pack
A fractional (part-time) CFO addresses a different problem than bookkeeping or tax filing. Books can be accurate and still fail to produce decision-grade visibility. The CFO function connects operating mechanics to cash, margin, and weekly decision-making through repeatable routines and controls.
Why growth often increases cash pressure
In many businesses, cash stress is driven by timing rather than performance. Value is delivered today, but cash arrives later. Payroll, vendors, rent, and tax payments move on schedule. As the gap widens, leadership often shifts into reactive behavior: delaying payments, pausing spend abruptly, or pursuing revenue that looks attractive but does not convert into cash predictably.
A fractional CFO reduces that pressure by making two things operationally stable:
1. how cash moves through the business week to week
2. which actions reliably improve profitability without creating downstream disruption
Cash is a system, not a bank balance
Teams often treat cash as “what is in the account.” A CFO treats cash as the outcome of operating mechanics:
- how quickly invoices are issued and collected
- how deliberately payments are scheduled and approved
- how much liquidity is held as a buffer
- where cash becomes trapped (receivables, inventory, work-in-progress, prepaid spend)
Even when the profit and loss statement appears strong, cash can remain constrained if working capital is unmanaged. Fractional CFO work focuses on levers that release cash without damaging operations.
The levers that change cash the fastest
Most organizations do not need dozens of new metrics. They need a small set of operating controls that convert financial activity into predictable liquidity.
1) Collections speed
Common symptoms
- invoices go out late
- disputes linger without ownership
- documentation requirements vary by customer and are not tracked consistently
What the CFO puts in place
- billing cadence and invoice standards
- customer-specific invoicing requirements (POs, approvals, backup)
- defined escalation steps and ownership
What improves
- cash arrives sooner and becomes more forecastable
2) Vendor payment rhythm
Common symptoms
- payments are rushed, inconsistent, or depend on message volume
- approvals are noisy and last-minute
- renewals appear as surprises
What the CFO puts in place
- a payment run calendar
- approval thresholds and rules that reduce exceptions
- renewal and subscription controls
What improves
- liquidity becomes predictable without starving operations
3) Inventory and work-in-progress discipline
Common symptoms
- cash gets tied up in inventory or project work that turns slowly into billings
- reorder and production decisions are not linked to cash and margin
What the CFO puts in place
- reorder rules and WIP discipline aligned to margin and liquidity
- visibility into where cash is trapped and why
What improves
- less cash remains trapped in operations
This is why “more revenue” is not a cash strategy. If the business scales faster than the cash cycle improves, liquidity pressure can intensify.
.jpg)
The 13-week forecast: a practical control system, not a spreadsheet
A budget is useful for direction. A rolling 13-week cash forecast is useful for control. The value is not the file itself, but the governance around it.
When run with discipline, the forecast converts urgent decisions into planned trade-offs and reduces repeat surprises. In practice, a controlled forecast usually includes:
Once this system exists, leadership can answer a question that matters more than any dashboard: How much cash will we have in six to ten weeks, and what is driving that outcome.
Accounts receivable: turn sales into cash without damaging relationships
Most receivables problems are process problems rather than customer intent. The common drivers are inconsistent invoicing, missing documentation, unclear ownership, and slow dispute resolution.
A fractional CFO typically improves collections by tightening a small set of routines:
- invoicing occurs on schedule
- key customers have documented invoice requirements
- collections has ownership and escalation steps
- disputes are tracked and resolved with defined timelines
The tone can remain relationship-friendly because expectations become consistent. Customers generally respond well to a business that runs cleanly.
Payables and spend: protect liquidity without slowing growth
A CFO introduces a payment run calendar and lightweight approval thresholds so spending remains controlled without creating bureaucracy. When done correctly, the business often moves faster: fewer last-minute approvals, fewer duplicated tools, fewer surprise renewals, and fewer “we need cash by Friday” situations.
Three operating rules that tend to hold up under growth:
- pay on a schedule
- approve based on rules, not message volume
- treat renewals and subscriptions as a managed pipeline
Profitability: make margin visible where decisions are made
Company-level profitability is too high-level for operational decisions. A CFO makes margin visible at the level where trade-offs happen, such as:
- product or service line
- customer segment
- channel
- entity (especially in Canada-the U.S. groups)
When margin is visible, decisions become more disciplined: pricing, discounting, and growth spending tie to contribution rather than assumptions. Profitability becomes an operating habit rather than an accounting outcome.
Cross-border reality in Canada–the U.S. operations: timing friction is common
Cross-border groups can feel cash-constrained even when the consolidated profit and loss statement looks strong. Compliance timing and operating timing do not always match across entities. Payroll cadence, remittances, and entity-level obligations can create pressure if liquidity sits in one place while costs hit in another.
A fractional CFO reduces this friction by:
- integrating compliance timing into the 13-week cash forecast
- setting entity-level liquidity thresholds
- defining funding routines so transfers are planned rather than reactive
The practical outcome is less firefighting and clearer visibility for leadership, lenders, and investors.
A simple diagnostic: symptom, meaning, CFO fix
Two scenarios that illustrate how fractional CFO support changes outcomes
Scenario 1: Services company with growing revenue and shrinking cash
A services firm can grow revenue and still feel cash-constrained when invoicing is inconsistent and collections are reactive. In practice, the team may deliver weekly, bill irregularly, and resolve disputes slowly because ownership is unclear. After a CFO introduces a fixed invoicing cadence, customer-specific requirements, and a clear escalation routine, receivables become more predictable. That predictability supports hiring and improves vendor relationships because payments stop being a guessing game.
Scenario 2: Cross-border group with recurring liquidity stress
A Canada-the U.S. group can look profitable on a consolidated basis but still feel unstable week to week if one entity carries payroll and compliance obligations while liquidity sits elsewhere. A fractional CFO stabilizes this by forecasting at the entity level, aligning compliance timing inside the 13-week view, and setting clear funding routines and liquidity thresholds. Leadership stops making emergency transfers and starts planning decisions weeks ahead.
What “good reporting” looks like
When financial operations are controlled, reporting becomes consistent and usable. The goal is a small, repeatable pack leadership can rely on.
How TYM Business Consulting supports this work
TYM Business Consulting’s CPA-led fractional CFO services are designed to establish stability first, then support scale. Engagements typically begin with a controlled weekly cash system (a 13-week forecast plus governance), then move to working capital routines (receivables, payables, payment calendar), and profitability visibility at the level where decisions happen.
For Canada-the U.S. groups, the focus includes entity-level cash planning and integration of compliance timing into forecasting, so transfers and obligations are planned rather than reactive.
.jpg)
.jpg)
